Business Health Insurance Pennsylvania Small

Why is it that so many are up in arms about the fact that it is mandatory that persons with health insurance at 48 of the 50 states require drivers to purchase liability insurance to show financial responsibility ? The two states are New Hampshire and Wisconsin. None of these 2 states are to continue the U.S. government during the term of the coverage of health care. But States are so far -

Virginia
Florida
Alabama
Colorado
Idaho
Louisiana
Michigan
Nebraska
Pennsylvania
SC
South Dakota
Texas
Utah
Washington
Georgia

all require people to drive in their state to have car insurance! What is the difference?? Is it not also force people to buy what they do not want? Is not that socialism like that? Why is this good, but when the federal government - which eventually cover the medical costs when people can not do that - requests take "fiscal responsibility" and purchase health insurance so you do not have to spend such sum to cover medical costs when people go up because of lack of payment, all of a sudden people come out of nowhere and starts screaming "this is unconstitutional!". Can anyone explain? ?

And to save many of you the trouble: I read the bill seeks to cover, because I work in an area that is directly effected either by way of the bill, and I am a small business owner . So save the rhetoric and answer the question.

The federal government (federal tax on income and Social Security taxes) already mandated that all citizens pay income taxes at least a portion of Medicaid and Medicare funds, and of course social security ... then the notion some people (very inattentive) were the health bill is the "first time the government has never authorized citizens to buy something" is ridiculous ... and the sad reality is that states whose attorneys general are too obtuse to understand that this is just sad!

I think it's a lot of pot too. I Bum medical expenses and living expenses. Now, I am forced to cover themselves, my family and my buttocks. I can not afford to support that many people. Many people choose not to drive. They take public transit, biking, walking. Report Abuse

The difference is that nobody is obliged to own a car. You do not want to buy car insurance? Do not own a car. Auto insurance protects other drivers that you can injure or whose property you can destroy in an accident. huge difference. Monumental difference!

Edit: The only way to "Obamacare" could be done is constitutional if they provided the health care they have grown and even has an option for those who fall between the cracks. Forcing people to buy something is unconstitutional.

Because you do not have to drive. You have a choice. Mandating health insurance is the purchase of a monthly fee for your very existence. In fine. There is no option puiblic. So insurrance car mounted with a mandate as insurrsance car set up by Bush Sr. insuurance health will increase. After all, all about profits. This bill is designed to help us. Its designed to help companies insurrance. Read it.

comparing the mandate auto insurance is not very good. IM sure to read the vitriol.
is simple:
our course will be 1% of our income ... 30k = $ 300
a cap from his pocket (up to 4k if I have this right)
and a subsidy for those who make less than 50k.
and we'll all be healthier b / c of it ... which means we'll all be better ...

we do not have.